Politics 2016 Analytics

Politically in America, I identify as...

 
 


Denotes mean (center) and standard deviation (shaded)

Total woxxers: 1048

Broad Histograms

99
85
91
86
92
100
79
98
145
172
Strongly affiliated!
Independent/ Indifferent

245
145
108
75
120
97
63
70
43
70
Democrat
Republican

234
170
113
110
105
75
67
59
52
63
Liberal
Conservative

Fine Histograms



3D Plot

Each dot is one person (how they rated the combination of three scales). You can rotate the graph with your mouse.

Feedback

Comment
sometimes it is unclear what my value on the scale represents. if i think racism is absolutely still systemic but i do think there has been progress on how and in what systems it effects i wasn't clear how i should rate it.
I want to use your code for my humor project.
There are OTHER parties/choices besides democrats and republicans
Love it
Where are the tabs
I'd like some feedback on my positionality relative to others who took this survey.
Dimensions are ok, but the layout is confusing since I'm used to read from left to right.
Very interesting survey format!
I feel like the scales were designed with a liberal bias
Took survey on Samsung Galaxy S6. Sliding on the scales was a little tricky, could be made a little smoother. On a couple questions I felt trapped between two choices I disagreed with but there wasn't an other, or N/A type option.
Soooooo......results?
Little difficult at first but not bad
sometimes i want to just pick 50%, but it's hard to choose 50% exactly sometimes, i keep tapping and it's 51% or 53% etc, also i can't tell which side of 50% i just clicked, i.e. 51% above or below 50% looks the same
nice
That was fun! Thanks Matthew! I'll pass this around...
The text in the surveys are equally important and I may have used different copy. Otherwise it wSabetter experience
great product!!
Very cool. Even though it took me the same 5-10 minutes another survey would have taken, I feel I am much more likely to do it if it's in this new format.
Nice survey bro, I'll be back
Maybe make it easier to be "50" on an issue. When there are 100 options it's tough to drill down into a certain number. On the other hand, it's nice to be able to scroll into a "range" where I think I come down on an issue.
Like the spectrum approach. Could acheive similar results by 4-5 well articulated multiple choice questions, but this way you dont have to read much.
Environmentalism should be focused on resource conservation rather than alleged global warming.
Poll needs more "n/a" or "other" options. I did not see my view represented in most of these answer choices
I can't believe that I just filled out this survey and don't get to view the results - isn't that the point? Now i feel used. I was planning to blog about this (I write for 2 major social media sites) but the inability to view results defeats the purpose of this. I would still like to blog about it but I fear that the really awesome survey interface will be wasted because there is no end result. I will check back again soon
So, is there any conclusion to this that we will be made aware of? It is unclear.
Keep up the great work!
Thanks for sharing, John! I really liked the format of this survey. Would've liked to have seen my responses compared to others at the end though, or just overall averages.
I basically left it at 50% when I thought it was a false choice or my feelings were way too complicated or there were too many variables to be charted accurately. That can happen a lot, but that can happen a lot in any survey, I suppose.
Income inequality is a good thing. Either everyone is dirt poor as in Cuba or North Korea or the system lets talented (or lucky people) get rich and some of their wealth is shared around. There are no other options. Your options on this question don't reflect reality. It is the job of Charity not government to address income inequality.
.
You're great